From 09c8fb55e4392e39d72efbedca9e77b341140997 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: tuhe <tuhe@dtu.dk> Date: Wed, 4 May 2022 14:58:04 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Update README.md --- README.md | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 24a849f..d29815d 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ # Unitgrade-devel **Note: This is the development version of unitgrade. If you are a student, please see http://gitlab.compute.dtu.dk/tuhe/unitgrade.** -Unitgrade is an automatic report and exam evaluation framework that enables instructors to offer automatically evaluated programming assignments. +Unitgrade is an automatic report and exam evaluation framework that enables instructors to offer automatically evaluated programming assignments. It is currently used in 02465: https://gitlab.gbar.dtu.dk/02465material/02465students -## Why not <insert alternative online framework here>? +## Why not (alternative online automatic evaluation framework)? I think the most important thing to ask from an automatic evaluation framework is that it helps the students become better programmers. Automatic evaluation frameworks are fundamentally about testing code. We know testing works, but we also know that not all ways of doing tests are equally good. Online testing has several clear disadvantages: @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ Videos where I try to talk and code my way through the examples can be found on - Autolab: https://youtu.be/h5mqR8iNMwM # Instructions and examples of use -The examples can be found in the `/examples` directory: https://gitlab.compute.dtu.dk/tuhe/unitgrade_private/-/tree/master/examples +The examples can be found in the `/examples` directory: https://gitlab.compute.dtu.dk/tuhe/unitgrade_private/-/tree/master/examples . ## A simple example Unitgrade makes the following assumptions: -- GitLab